Fatigue … and death
“I don‘t remember it happening because I fell asleep at the wheel, but when I woke up we were in an accident.” -Candy Baldwin, as told to the Washington Post from her bed in Maryland Shock Trauma Center, following an accident on the Chesapeake Bay Bridge that left truck driver John Short dead.
Let me give you this scenario. A young truck driver (let‘s say 25 or 26, been driving for three years now) falls asleep at the wheel of his 80,000-pound rig and causes an accident, leaving a 57 year-old man dead - a man with a wife and kids.
The trucker has no record; he‘s a good kid, well liked by friends, co-workers, and family. His log book is clean, but he‘d been at a friend‘s wedding, stayed up most of the day and night, before going on duty at 3 a.m. Didn‘t get a lot of sleep - in fact, didn‘t sleep much at all, though he was off-duty for the required 10 hours.
(The Chesapeake Bay Bridge — site of Sunday’s tragic car-truck crash.)
The accident itself is front-page news - ties up weekend traffic on a major bridge for a whole day, leaving thousands of people stuck for hours, fuming in their cars - as it happens not 50 miles from the nation‘s capital.
What do you think happens next?
Several things you can count on: civil lawsuits by the dead man‘s family against the truck driver and his company, alongside manslaughter charges against the trucker from the state. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) would swoop in to perform an exhaustive safety audit of the company and there would be more press conferences than you can count by politicians, safety groups, etc., calling for more laws, stiffer penalties, and greater enforcement, covering the entire trucking industry in broad, brutal brushstrokes of negligence, incompetence, and other vitriolic prose.
OK then. Now let‘s flip it around.
Car driver, just 19 years old: up all night at her mother‘s wedding. Falls asleep at the wheel. Resulting accident leaves 57 year-old truck driver dead and traffic snarled for days. You know the accident I‘m talking about, too.
Now what happens? More importantly, what‘s not going to happen?
[First of all, give the kid credit. She admitted she fell asleep. And my heart goes out to her in a big way - not only is her body badly broken, not only does she face years of physical rehabilitation, she‘ll never ever forget that this crash killed somebody.]
First of all, there‘s no logbook to check. She‘s not required to have one. No rule says she must have 10 hours off duty before getting behind the wheel. (Not that the 10-hour rule would‘ve automatically made her well-rested and ready to drive - you can‘t legislate good sleep, just the way you can‘t legislate human behavior, though try as we might).
You also won‘t see FMCSA visiting her anytime soon. And public press conferences, by politicians and national safety groups, condemning her in harsh, provocative language? I sincerely (and hopefully) doubt it.
Here‘s the thing, though, and this is important. Fatigue caused this accident between the car and the truck - and fatigue is a far, far greater problem for car drivers than truckers.

(You just can’t legislate good, restful sleep — for truckers or car drivers.)
You may remember the FMCSA‘s exhaustive Large Truck Crash Causation Study published last year. Based on three years worth of study and a detailed examination of over 965 truck-car collisions, the feds found that car drivers caused 55% of those crashes. More importantly, however, they also discovered that on average car drivers we‘re TWICE as likely to be fatigued as truck drivers.
The study also found that human error was by far the leading cause of these crashes, ranked among the top eight factors for truckers and car drivers. But notice the huge differences in exactly what KINDS of human error are involved between the two groups:
Truck drivers:
1. Following too close
2. Made illegal maneuver
3. Inadequate surveillance
4. Traveling too fast for conditions
5. Inattention
6. Stop required
7. External distraction
8. Brake problems
Car drivers:
1. Illegal maneuver
2. Fatigue
3. Illness
4. Inattention
5. Internal distraction
6. Inadequate surveillance
7. Illegal drugs
8. Too fast for conditions
Is it not surprising that fatigue, illness, and illegal drug use are major issues in the crashes FMCSA studied among CAR DRIVERS … yet not truck drivers? That maybe logbooks, medical qualifications and random drug testing might be needed for CAR DRIVERS today? It does make one wonder …
It brings to mind something Jeffrey Loftus, a transportation safety technology specialist with FMCSA, said during PeopleNet‘s 6th annual User Conference last week: “Everyone is to blame in these crashes; the bottom line is, it‘s a shared responsibility.”
That‘s a truth, however, we‘re having a hard time recognizing in our driving culture.





August 13th, 2008 at 5:27 am
They list ‘inattention’ as #5 & #4 on the list. I believe that it should be the number one on both lists. A person could make a case for it being the root cause in all cases. The only exception being drugs, that would be intentional and should be prosecuted accordingly.
I had driven across the Bay Bridge a few times in the past and never gave it a thought other than how great it was. I think now that I would cross it with some apprehension.
August 13th, 2008 at 8:34 am
The comparison is flawed. The CDL holders ratio of miles traveled versus the car driver are not proportionate, just as the responsibilities of reason in relation to age. The rsponsiblity is increased for vehicle size requiring a higher level of qualification and age. Judgement is a 24/7 attribute. The right call is always the debate. All involved parties need to ask, is my lifestyle mine or dictated by society. I remember attending a wedding reception where no alcohol was served and some people were offended. I guess the bottom line is where do you find your treasure?
August 14th, 2008 at 12:04 am
Candy is one of my good friends. She is an amazing hearted person and has gone out of her way many of times to help me and my friends. I havent spoken with her but by her character I know that she is devistated. God bless the truck driver, He is from my hometown, its just so sad the whole situation. I totally understand the point this article is making, I just want to let everyone know Candy is an amazing person, and lucky to be alive.
Thank you all.
August 18th, 2008 at 2:39 pm
At least Candy can still feel “devasted.” She must do the time for her crime accidental or not.
Falling asleep is not an excuse or justification but it is IRRESPONSIBLE.
September 7th, 2008 at 10:53 pm
Explain to me how someone who was only asleep didn’t wake up when she was hit by a semi-truck. She actually slept through all this. She obviously had to have been drinking to have slept through such a trauma. And because of this, she shouldn’t have been driving. This was her irresponsibility. Reports indicated that there were other people in her car; why didn’t they wake her up? She also has had other encounters with the law, so she is not so innocent as the author indicates — she has a record. This immature, irresponsible killer should have her license taken away from her permanently so that she can’t hurt other people with her stupidity. What remorse has she shown other than indicating that she wasn’t responsible because she was asleep as though that was a legitimate excuse.
Leave a Comment
Advertisement
About
Trucks at Work: Sean Kilcarr comments on trends affecting the many different strata of the trucking industry -- light and medium duty fleets up through over-the-road truckload, less-than-truckload, and private fleet operationsAdvertisement
Categories
Calendar
Archives
Your Account
Subscribe
Back to Top