Slogging through
“Slow U.S. economic activity and fuel price increases hit us and our customers during the quarter. Even though economists do not predict a recovery until 2009, we anticipate that the second half of 2008 will generate modestly better results than the first half, assuming business conditions do not worsen.” -Kurt Kuehn, CFO, United Parcel Service.
Things are tough, no doubt about it. Fuel costs are through the roof, while freight volumes remain stagnant or down. It doesn‘t help that the oh-so-smart whizzes from financial sector are finally showing how truly stupid they‘ve been with the whole mortgage-back securities debacle, with Wachovia but the latest big banking concern to own up to its “misjudgments” - to the tune of nearly $9 billion in losses for the second quarter this year.
Freight companies, though, seem to be muddling through all of this. It‘s not pretty, however: tons of truckers have closed up shop (almost 1,000 since the start of 2008, including big names like Alvan Motor Freight and Jevic Transportation). Yet those that remain seem to be making the best of it, digging in until better days return.
“Although operating conditions in the second quarter were challenging, we firmly believe the long-term growth fundamentals for our company and for our industry are very favorable,” said Scott Davis, chairman and CEO at United Parcel Service. “We are helping our customers manage through this difficult period while doing everything we can inside UPS to adapt to current conditions.”
Big Brown reported a 6.7% revenue increase in the second quarter but an 18.3% decline in earnings to 85 cents per share, compared to $1.04 per share during the same period in 2007. Increasing fuel costs and a stagnant U.S. economy caused the earnings decline in both UPS‘s U.S. domestic and international package segments, said Davis, though in contrast, its supply chain and freight segment posted a substantial improvement in profitability.
From April through the end of June, UPS delivered consolidated volume of 959 million packages, essentially unchanged from the second quarter last year. Revenue rose to $13.0 billion and revenue per piece increased 5.9%. Yet results were negatively affected by a 67% increase in fuel expense, a reduction in premium product volumes, and weakness in U.S. imports.

The slow U.S. economy caused average daily volume in the U.S. to decline 1.3% in the quarter and also contributed to a more pronounced reduction in premium products than in the previous quarter, with volumes dropping 0.7% for ground shipments. These factors, along with the rapid increase in fuel cost and the impact of the two-month lag in the application of the fuel surcharge, were responsible for the declines in second quarter operating results, UPS said. International results were also negatively impacted by higher fuel costs, declining U.S. import volume and slower growth in premium services in the major regions of the world, the company noted.
UPS Freight LTL revenue grew 7.2%, but shipments declined 2.3% as a consequence of the stagnant U.S. economy. However, its supply chain services segment saw revenue increase almost 11% with operating profit climbing more than 50% - driven by the continued strong performance in UPS‘s forwarding and logistics businesses.
Kurt Kuehn, UPS‘s CFO, noted that while the company is projecting profits for the second half of the year on the order of $1.78 to $1.98 per share compared to $1.72 per share for the first half of 2008, comparisons to last year‘s results would be more difficult in the third quarter and moderate in the fourth. “We are taking the necessary steps to control costs, add value for customers and grow our business while adjusting to the realities of today‘s challenging environment,” he added.
Trucks sales are, of course, choppy as a result of all of this. “The dramatic increase in diesel prices, coupled with declining housing starts and auto production, impacted U.S. and Canadian Class 8 truck sales in the first half,” said Dan Sobic, senior vice president ay Paccar, parent company of Peterbilt and Kenworth. Paccar projects that Class 8 industry retail sales for 2008 are expected to be in the range of 150,000 to 165,000 units.

The truck market in Europe, however, looks a little brighter. “The European economy, especially Central Europe, continues to experience moderate growth,” noted Aad Goudriaan, president of DAF Trucks, another Paccar subsidiary. “Industry truck sales in Europe above 15 tonnes are expected to set a record of 350,000-360,000 units compared to 340,000 in 2007.” He said DAF is increasing production by 5% in September to meet strong customer demand.
Back on the home front, though, it‘s definitely going to be slow going for a while for truckers - and no one is looking through rose-colored glasses at the months ahead.
“Though this economic decline has not been as deep as others in the past, it appears to be lasting longer,” said Robert Davidson, president and CEO of Arkansas Best, the holding company for LTL carrier ABF Freight System, in its second quarter earnings statement. “As a result, ABF will continue to carefully manage labor costs and equipment levels to match available freight in our system until economic conditions show meaningful improvement.”





July 23rd, 2008 at 4:44 pm
The price of fuel will continue to greatly affect everything we do and as a result trucking companies will suffer. In the end the consumer will pay the price in higher cost of goods at the retail level. In the meantime, the transportation industry is caught in the middle of all this adjustment process.
What are trucking companies doing to keep in business? Well, sound business practices, management and implementation of these principles will provide the basis to stay in business.
On the other hand, there are some things that companies and owner operators can do to minimize the effects of higher fuel prices. Fuel Freedom International, a company based in Altamonte Springs, FL, is marketing a product called the MPG MegaCrumbs as well as an oil treatment product called SulfRx. When properly used, these products provide on average a 10% improvement on fuel mileage. There are many variables that affect the results such as condition of the vehicle, speed, terrain, wind, etc. but overall, the improvement is significant.
Those of you looking for ways to reduce your cost of fuel, regardless of company size, you owe it to your employees and yourself to look in to it. These products have another significant benefit to the environment, the CO2 emissions are reduced by 75% or more. So, do yourself a favor and review the products, test them for yourself, save some money, and keep on trucking!
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at fuel@ffivision.com
Jose Azcarate
http://www.TooMuchForDiesel.Com
July 24th, 2008 at 10:20 am
Sean,
With 1000 trucking companies out of business in 2008, why hasn’t that supply reduction increased demand, therefore rates, therefore revenue and profit?
It seems too convenient to blame sluggish profits and no growth solely on fuel costs and down markets. I’d like some of my competitors to close up and see what that does for my demand and pricing. I pay through the nose for commodities also.
Regards,
Gary
Leave a Comment
Advertisement
About
Trucks at Work: Sean Kilcarr comments on trends affecting the many different strata of the trucking industry -- light and medium duty fleets up through over-the-road truckload, less-than-truckload, and private fleet operationsAdvertisement
Categories
Calendar
Archives
Your Account
Subscribe