“U.S. consumption of liquid fuels and other petroleum [products] are expected to decline in 2008 by about 190,000 barrels per day as a result of the economic slowdown and high petroleum prices.” –from the Energy Information Administration’s short-term energy outlook published May 6.
With diesel fuel at over four dollars a gallon throughout much of the U.S. – hitting the $5 mark in California – and gasoline pricing not far behind, it would seem a big stretch to even bring up the term “silver lining.” Yet besides record-setting pump and oil prices (which closed above the $128 per barrel mark yesterday) there’s another statistic to consider as well – the first reduction in U.S. imports in 30 years.

(Photo courtesy of the Penn Jersey Truckstop)
True, the drop is pretty small: According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), the U.S. imported 57.9% of its oil in the first quarter this year, down from 58.2% over the same period in 2007. Yet that 3/10ths of 1% marks the first time since 1977 that this country reduced oil imports – due largely to high prices and the current U.S. economic slump, but also to the rising use of ethanol, biodiesel and other biofuel products, along with higher average vehicle fuel economy, noted Guy Caruso, the EIA’s administrator.
Caruso’s agency also recorded these statistics: while world oil consumption is projected to grow by 1.2 million barrels per day (bbl/d) in 2008, after accounting for increased ethanol use, U.S. petroleum consumption is projected to fall by 330,000 bbl/d this year. By 2015, if these trend lines hold, the EIA projects U.S. petroleum imports could drop to 50% of all oil consumed.
I know, I know: none of this provides much relief to the wallets of truckers rapidly being emptied at the refueling island. And the way things are shaping up, truckers should expect to keep paying some steep prices for diesel in the coming months.

(Photo courtesy of Petro Stopping Centers.)
“The oil supply system continues to operate at near capacity and remains vulnerable to both actual and perceived supply disruptions,” said the EIA last week. “The supply and demand balance for the remainder of the year is tighter. World oil markets are particularly tight during the first half of 2008, with year-over-year growth in world oil consumption outstripping growth in non-Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) production by over 1 million bbl/d. The combination of rising global demand, fairly normal seasonal inventory patterns, slow gains in non-OPEC supply, and low levels of available surplus production capacity is providing firm support for prices. The flow of investment money into commodities markets and ongoing geopolitical concerns in a number of producing countries, including Nigeria, Iraq, and Venezuela, have contributed to crude oil price volatility.”
However, consider these numbers, gleaned from Jim Angel and Fred Hammer’s recent presentation at the National Private Truck Council’s (NPTC) annual convention last month: In 2007, the total cost of diesel fuel used to move freight totaled $112.5 billion for the trucking industry … yet shippers paid over $65 billion in fuel surcharges last year.
That meant truckers paid out $47.5 billion for fuel, which is lower than the $53 billion it shelled out for fuel in 2003. It’s not cause for a party (for $47-plus billion out of pocket is a wallop on the bottom line no matter how you look at it) but it’s easier than footing a nearly $113 billion tab let me tell you.
Fred Hammer, corporate transportation manager for Shopko Stores – a grocery chain based out of Wisconsin that operates 38 tractors and 400 trailers – also noted that high prices are driving fuel conservation efforts like never before at his fleet and many, many others. By really focusing on a broad fuel savings strategy – which includes efforts to reduce deadhead miles, analyze vehicle performance to boost miles per gallon and decrease idle time, offer drivers incentives to reduce fuel consumption, plus cut down out of route miles and boost vehicle productivity, Shopko cut its fuel expenditures by 9.5%. If fleets continue to reduce fuel consumption metrics like this across the industry, oil imports – especially from nations hostile to us such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, and Venezuela – will continue to fall.
Of course, there’s also a lot of speculation going on in the global oil market right now, too, not unlike what happened in the U.S. housing market, which is adding to the big price increases we’re seeing. If that bubble collapses, leading to oil pricing drops and thus lower fuel costs, we need to make certain we don’t revert to our oil, fuel-guzzling ways. The EIA, for example, predicts that we will return to slurping behavior, as it believe by 2030 imports will make up 54% of all the oil the U.S. consumes, despite falling to 50% in 2015. We must make sure that once we pass the fuel spikes of today, we don’t end up back in the same old habits tomorrow. We’ll see what happens.












May 20th, 2008 @ 6:32 pm
Sean,
You write; “….there’s another statistic to consider as well – the first reduction in U.S. imports in 30 years.” To which I reply; “So?”
That, along with a fuel savings strategy, may be good news for a fleet’s operating budget but does nothing to relieve fuel costs based on supply and demand. Emerging markets will gobble up oil supplies. If I give up coffee with the expectation of the price going down but my neighbor(s) start drinking and drinks as much as I do, how will the price decrease given a new demand has been created?
Maybe that wasn’t the point of your piece but no one is talking about where all this oil conservation is going to get us.
Regards,
Gary
May 20th, 2008 @ 6:37 pm
Gary,
The point of my piece is this: no, the price won’t go down, but if we use LESS foreign oil — specifically from Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iran, Iraq, Nigeria, and Venezuela — we’ll be LESS vulnerable to real supply shocks if said nations turn off the spigot. And the more we spend on domestically-made fuel, such as ethanol and biodiesel, the more dollars that stay at home. Biofuels cost as much as petroleum-based fuels right now; the big difference is the money we pay stays here in the U.S., instead of filling OPECs coffers.
May 21st, 2008 @ 11:14 am
To Everyone Out There,
We are just all wasting our time, FUEL is never going to come down AGAIN, maybe a few cents, but that’s it.
First of all we have a President who’s financial interest are better serve if the price of oil continues to skyrocket. What do you think we would find inside the stock portfolio of the Bush family?
Second, we have candidates that have no clue as to how they would bring down the price of oil. They have openly admited this, they don’t have the magic cure.
Third, there’s a whole lot of people, making a whole lot of money of this oil problem, and I’m not just talking about OPEC, there’s a lot of people here in the U.S.A. lining their pockets with Green Dollars.
Regarding the fuel surcharge, there’s a couple of problems with that also, most of this money is not making it to the trucker who buys the fuel, some Freight Brokers, keep the money and never pass along this surcharge to the trucker. Also the answer is not to raise our rates, as this further impacts the inflation problem, the answer is to find a way to have the damn fuel price go down. If we charge more to move a load of lettuce, this cost gets passed along to the end consumer: you, me, our kids, our parents, our neighbors, thus helping inflation to skyrocket.
What is the solution? To bring fuel prices down, and hopefully everyone will start to lower the price of everything. Unfortunately oil is one of the only commodities where the law of supply and demand doesn’t hold water. The law of supply and demand states, as more quantities of a given product get sold, the price per item of this product should go down. Example, when cell phones first came out, not too many people had them, the average cost was around $3.00 per minute, plus God Forbid you went out of your home area. But today even my 11 year old son has a cell phone, as more cell phones were sold, prices came down dramatically.
But unfortunately, we all know that’s not the case with oil. They charge us more, bacause of hurricanes, because the summer is coming, because the winter is coming and every other excuse they can think of. Everyone wants to blame OPEC and even Hugo Chavez, but hey people, let me ask everyone out here, what does OPEC and Hugo Chavez have to do with Exxon-Mobil and their ASTRONOMICAL profits?
It’s time all of us “Independent Transportation Providers” (yes, let’s get some pride and stop calling ourselves Independent Truckers: we provide services to America just like lawyers and doctors) let’s unite and stick together once and for all. I have a plan that will at least help us control some of our cost, if we all UNITE!!! I want to form an association that is at least 1,000 trucks strong.
Anyone out there that may be interested, please e-mail me at AssociatedofNJ@msn.com, or call me at 201-206-8695.
Thank you, and drive safely.
Regards
Bill Molina