The HOS fracas
“When the situation was manageable it was neglected, and now that it is thoroughly out of hand, we apply too late the remedies which might have affected a cure. There is nothing new in this story. It is as old as the Sibylline books. It falls into that long dismal catalogue of the fruitlessness of experience and the confirmed unteachability of mankind.” — Winston Churchill.
So, here we are, staring at a three month window within which the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) must come up with rules to replace the soon-to-be-extinct 11-hour daily driving limit and 34-hour retart provision of current hours of service (HOS) regulations. Hopefully, the new rules won’t make an appearance at the 11th hour on the 11th day (Dec. 27) when those provisions expire as ruled by the U.S. Courth of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Then again, the way things have been going in trucking lately, anything is possible.
Take current HOS rules. These actually represent FMCSA’s ‘Plan B’ package because its first attempt at reform back in 2000 by creating five DIFFERENT sets of HOS rules died a fast and ugly death, forcing the agency to cobble together something on the fly. The trucking industry initally cried woe and doom when the ‘Plan B’ rules were announced in 2003, saying they’d ruin productivity, efficiency, yadda, yadda, yadda. Yet here we are at the end of a long battle by the industry to KEEP the parts of those very same rules it didn’t like the first time around.
So-called safety groups such as Public Citizen never liked any of the HOS reforms FMCSA formulated right from the start and waged a long — and ultimately successful — campaign in the courts to oust these rules, and will no doubt gear up again to fight whatever FMCSA comes up with as a replacement. Joan Claybrook, former head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and president of Public Citizen since 1982, has publicly stated that she wants driving time for truck drivers dialed back to eight hours a day maximum. So it’s a good bet she’ll fight tooth and nail against anything over that number.
All of this back and forth, of course, directly impacts an industry responsible for moving 80% of the nation’s freight. That’s a cold fact that doesn’t seem to resonate at all with anyone outside transportation. Look at just some of the issues affecting the trucker’s workday.
For starters, there aren’t enough truck drivers to haul all that freight — we’re short 20,000 a year now, but by 2015 that’ll be up to about 100,000 annually. Massive congestion on our roadways is slowing down freight, killing the miles drivers need to accrue to get paid — and their pay, by the way, ain’t good for the work they do. Then throw in the shippers and receivers, who make trucks wait for hours and hours, then force many drivers to load and unload trailers without adequate compenstation — something Public Citizen never addresses in its safety efforts, by the way.
Here’s what I think: let’s get radical. Let’s go ahead an lobby for an eight hour drive-time limit, with a 10-hour on-duty period. Make it part of the regulations that drivers CANNOT load and unload their trailers, period. Mandate fines for shippers and receivers that make trucks wait more than two hours — say, $1,500 an hour. Maybe $2,000 an hour. Since we’re tracking trucks by satellite and cellular networks today, that clock would be easy to monitor, too. Also restore the split-sleeper berth provision to drivers so they can take a break.
Now, everyone with say ‘This is impossible: are you crazy??!!” No, it’s not impossible — fleets will need to recalculate their routes, of course, as well as driver pay rates. But it can be done — shippers and receivers will see their freight bills skyrocket, of course, but hey! They’ll adjust. So will we, the consumers. Everything will cost more, efficiency will suffer, but the world won’t collapse — and trucking will be allowed to do its work, without all the regulatory back and forth.
I mean, what’s to argue? The safety groups WANT these kinds of work hours established — I say give it to them. And let them do the fixing if it boomerangs. As long as the industry keeps improving its safety profile, makes a decent profit and drivers make a living, that’s what matters .





October 4th, 2007 at 4:07 pm
As a former driver and now the manger of a small trucking company, I am stunned by the stupidity on display by nearly everyone involved. In the first place, fatalities are on the down swing, especially when accidents are posted “per million miles.” Secondly, anyone who believes that not allowing drivers to take a short nap or break without penalizing them on their available hours to drive is living in a different world. Taking a break to eat lunch or dinner, take a short nap, or to let the traffic clear around the larger cities is often well-advised as opposed to forcing the issue.
As a somewhat realted issue, we are a refrigerated carrier, and we face delivery windows set by the various warehouses we deliver to that stretch practically around the clock. Trying to regulate sleep to perfectly match the “circadian” body clock is nearly hopeless when faced with such a wide variety of delivery windows. Finally (I know this will sound incredibly calloused, but I think it needs to be said) how many lives are going to be saved? What percentage of accidents can be attributed to only the fatigued trucker, and not any other of several factors? In a nation of millions of drivers, why are these “safety advocates” pursuing this so relentlessly while ignoring the much more attainable and realistic goals of reducing the number of drunk drivers or mandating classes on sharing the roads with trucks? Their single-mindedness on this issue calls into question their perspective. Apparently, compromise is not in their vocabulary.
Fine — limit truck drivers to an 8-hour day. Also, limit railroad engineers and airline pilots to the same standard. Of course, you should probably include doctors and nurses, since their jobs also affect the health and safety of the nation. My point: there is no end to this ludicrously overbearing pursuit of safety. Heck, we don’t even know if it will work.
October 5th, 2007 at 12:58 pm
Brad:
You make some excellent points, especially in terms of the overbearing focus on truck safety to the exclusion of other more quickly attainable goals. For example, of the 42,642 people who lost their lives in highway accidents in 2006, 15,121 people were killed by drunk drivers, while only 4,995 died as a result of truck crashes.
Giving truck drivers the opportunity to take breaks for food and rest as their body dictates, rather than follow rigid written rules, also makes perfect sense in the real world — it would be heartening to see such sense once again applied to the regulations.
And would limiting truck drivers to eight hours behind the wheel really improve safety? I’d like to see that scenario studied myself.
Thanks for writing in.
October 11th, 2007 at 2:44 pm
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that drowsiness is the primary causal factor in 100,000 police-reported crashes each year, resulting in 76,000 injuries and 1,500 deaths. These numbers represent 1 to 3 percent of all policereported crashes and 4 percent of fatalities (Lyznicki, Doege, Davis and Williams, 1998; Knipling and Wang, 1995). Other sources have reported higher estimates. Around 20% of fatal road accidents involve driver fatigue. According to VicRoads Road Accident Facts Victoria, 1998 Edition, about 30% of severe single vehicle crashes in rural areas involve the driver being fatigued.
I heard in Canada that there’s a company that monitors and allows to act accordingly upon lowering levels of an individual‘s cognitive resources availability, which may happen due to several reasons ranging from fatigue to concurrency of tasks. It’s Robert Transport who is currently testing this unit. My company will wait to see if this unit is a good product. So maybe we will put that in our fleet.
Leave a Comment
Advertisement
About
Trucks at Work: Sean Kilcarr comments on trends affecting the many different strata of the trucking industry -- light and medium duty fleets up through over-the-road truckload, less-than-truckload, and private fleet operationsAdvertisement
Categories
Advertisement
Calendar
Archives
Your Account
Subscribe