I’ve long been disturbed by how so many people– truckers included– still do not wear seatbelts when in a vehicle. Maybe I am a hopeless Safety Sam but I even tell my kids to stay buckled up when we pull into a gas station or wherever on the off chance that someone may plow into our car while we are assumably safely parked.
Why might I think so? Well, one of many reasons leaps right to mind. Back in my college days, several of my friends and I spent a pleasant if Scotch-soaked evening in our hometown’s Safari Pub (I think every burg worth its salt had such an establishment in the ’70s but I digress). Things got interesting after last call when we all left and headed for our separate cars.
It was raining cats and dogs and foggy to boot and partly due to that and partly due to the ample time he’d just spent with Johnnie Walker, my friend Jim (just like in A.A., no surnames here!) fairly promptly drove the front of his late-model Pinto into a rather high parking-lot curb. His speed was low enough for the little car to look hardly damaged.
But he was not wearing his seat belt and upon impact, his body travelled forward unimpeded and– not being the tallest guy around– his mouth slammed into the steering wheel. That led to a trip to the emergency room where a plastic surgeon was called in (wisely) to sew up the insides of his cheeks, which were cut to ribbons by the orthodontic braces on his teeth.
Lesson learned: Could it be any easier? Just wear the seatbelt and save yourself all sorts of pain and suffering if not worse. As for me, the only place you’ll catch me in a vehicle without being buckled up is in my own driveway.
No wonder I am thrilled to report that Lifeguard Technologies– by far the biggest supplier of seatbelts to trucking– has launched its “Click, Tug and Snug” (CTS) safety campaign to help drive up the use of seatbelts by truck drivers.
If you click below, you can see a sample clip of the nine-minute CTS training video right from here:
If you click here, you will go directly to Lifeguard’s CTS site where you can view four clips from the video to get a fuller sense of its content.
You can order free copies of the video for training purposes from Lifeguard at the CTS site by clicking on the “Contact” tab.
According to Lifeguard, the video is intended to be generic but does include instructions on how to use their Komfort Latch and Sliding Komfort Latch to make wearing seatbelts more comfortable. The company also urges fleets to equip cabs with high-visibility (typically orange) seatbelts to encourage consistent use as they make it is easy to see who’s buckled up at a glance.
And if you– or your drivers– still need convincing as to why everyone should wear seatbelts in every vehicle, take a look at what someone who really should have known better has to say on this topic:
Not at all unlike auto giants GM and Ford– and diesel engine maker Cummins among other manufacturers serving trucking here– North American-based automotive parts suppliers are apparently prospering by going global.
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal today, both Visteon Corp. and TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. have “joined the growing list of parts suppliers reporting improved financial results thanks to cost cuts and efforts to penetrate international markets, even as the outlook worsens for car and truck sales in North America.”
The reporter goes on to observe that “Most U.S. parts makers… have spent the past few years closing plants in North America and moving production to low-cost countries. Most have cut their North American work force.”
So this is really a good news-bad news story. It can’t be all bad for the U.S. economy (and presumably the Canadian, too, given its huge role in auto and truck production) for these North American industrial powerhouses to be doing well financially; it certainly can’t be bad for their stockholders and maybe not even for their customers.
On the other hand, the shift of automobile and auto parts production overseas not only removes high-paying factory jobs from North America, it reduces the amount of that outbound freight available for U.S. and Canadian motor and rail carriers to haul to ports.
I know free-traders would argue that those factory jobs will be duly replaced by high-tech or service jobs including those in the so-called “knowledge sector” and they may be right, although I for one am not entirely sure they are.
But one thing I think everyone in trucking can question is this: Will the automotive freight now being created elsewhere in the world ever be replaced here by anything a truck can haul?
Where have all the parts gone? Gone to overseas many have…
How many times have you passed a state trooper or other police officer dealing with a trucker or motorist stopped on the side of the road– and we are talking flashing lights, the whole works here– and you have not bothered to move one lane over, even if that lane was wide open? Well, shame on any of us who has not given that officer as much of a safety cushion as humanly possible.
For the sake of these officers doing their duty not to mention the persons they are ticketing or helping, as the case may be, please do so. And if you run a fleet, please instruct your drivers to do the same. In many states, it’s the law and it ought to be so in every state if you ask me.
Whenever possible, give them a wide enough berth to safely do their job…
While a Pennsylvania state trooper was dealing with a motorist he pulled over for speeding, he was struck by the mirror of an SUV going by. That driver kept going and is now wanted for hit-and-run and I imagine that thwacking of a police officer is not going to sit well with any judge down the road.
Anyway, it turns out the ticketed motorist was an EMT and she got out of her car– putting herself potentially in the path of another lousy driver– and rendered assistance to the stricken trooper who wound up with a broken arm and bruised spine.
But he could have been much more severely injured if not killed. All because someone did not have the brain power to either move the hell over or at least proceed by with the utmost caution.
It was just last week that Ford Motor Co. surprised many by reporting strong first-quarter results.
Ford’s long-term strategy of emphasizing global growth was credited in large part with that performance: “We had a challenging first quarter due to market conditions and the slowing economy,” said chairman & CEO Mike Bannister according to a news release. “However, our strong underwriting and risk management practices continue to generate high-quality assets. Our global transformation begun a decade ago has laid a solid foundation to help us weather challenging business conditions.”
The only shame is that the folks in the Glass House did not see the outside world clearly enough to have started the “global transformation” long long ago, as their competitors in places like Toyota City did– long long ago.
The view from this glass house is looking up lately…
But don’t take it from me that one of our nation’s industrial powerhouses is back on track. Nope, much better to listen to gazillionaire gadfly and corporate raider extraordinaire Kirk Kerkorian. According toThe New York Times this morning, Kerkorian, via his Tracinda Corp. investing arm, “had acquired a 4.7 percent stake in the Ford Motor Company and planned a $170 million cash offer for an additional 20 million shares.”
This bid of course follows Kerkorian’s earlier attempts to buy Chrysler and also attain a big enough stake in GM to influence its global course.
Ford execs, not to mention members of the still-ruling family, are perhaps less than joyful about Kerkorian’s appearance at their gates. “We welcome confidence in Ford and the progress we are making on our transformation plan,” said a statement issued by the autmaker and reported by The New York Times. “Any investor can purchase Ford shares, which are sold on the open market. The Ford team remains focused on executing our plan to transform Ford into a lean global enterprise delivering profitable growth for all.”
They might not like having crafty old Kirk trying to gain leverage on them; that is understandable. But getting that kind of attention does show that Ford’s latest “better idea” is working… and what’s bad about that?
It seems like just yesterday I was first introduced to the Modec– an electric truck headed to the U.S. from England– by a rather eccentric and yet altogether fitting indoor test drive.
The Modec gets its good looks from its mother– the London taxi cab!
I took my silent spin in a Modec back in February at the National Truck Equipment Assn. (NTEA) Work Truck Show in Atlanta and my write-up ran in our April print edition but may be read online here.
At the NTEA show, the chairman of Coventry-based Modec Limited, Jamie Lord Borwick, stated that the OEM, whose roots are in the manufacture of London’s iconic black cabs, was exploring its options but gave no definitive time frame for when it might enter the truck market here.
Yet now I hear tell from William Doelle, director of business development for the young truck maker’s U.S. operation, that “in part owing to the favorable comments from journalists, and our winning the innovative product of the year [award] at the Work Truck Show, we have moved up our U.S. launch date… We are going to launch a select fleet of 50 Modecs– or more– in Washington DC starting in January of 2009.”
Like so many other things– good and otherwise– occurring anew in modern-day America, it’s happening first in the Golden State. Four-buck-a-gallon gasoline, that’s what.
Now, hold on, I know the rocketing cost of fuel is having a far bigger impact on truckers.
No matter how many times good scouts in the “mainstream” media, not to mention trucking advocates, point out the suffering of truckers and how the ridiculously high cost of diesel is boosting the prices all Americans pay for consumer goods, nothing will grab the attention of the Average Joe and Jane like forking over a C-Note every time they’ve gotta gas up their own four wheels. If that happens enough, may be more voters will vote this Fall and may be more voters will think long and hard about who they will vote for– this Fall and for a long, long time to come. One can hope, anyway.
This and a buck-eighty-five will get a four-wheeler filled up… and buy a cup of coffee.
I don’t catch him every night but it seems every time lately that he has started off a broadcast on the high cost of fuel he has done so by referencing right off the bat how hard-hit truckers are and then reiterates how what they are paying for diesel impacts all of us at the grocery and every other store.
I have heard Mr. Williams described pretty much as a self-made and self-effacing regular guy out of New Jersey. The Garden State is a trucking state for sure, so may be that explains it. Or may be he drove a truck once upon a time or has some truckers in his family tree.
Whatever the provenance of his informed view of trucking, it pleases me no end that at least one member of the much maligned Fourth Estate– outside the Trucking Press Corps, that is– cannot be accused of exercising an automatic bias against trucking.
NBC’s Brian Williams: He’s not all wet about trucking.
In the very early ’80s, yours truly was dispatched to Vegas (back when the town still seemed to have a Rat Packer or two floating around) for a very razz-ma-tazz roll-out of Isuzu commercial trucks in the U.S.
Now the thing is I can’t recall whether the work trucks or the cars, pickups and SUVs (sold by a separate division) got here first but what I remember the best about the truck intro was a very slick video Isuzu ran. It emphasized the firm’s long and fabled automotive history and that the company name was correctly pronounced “Eee-zoo-sue,” NOT “Eye-zoo-sue,” which seems to be what many truckers prefer.
Well, you say “Isuzu” and I say “Isuzu,” but it doesn’t change the news the Japanese automaker has announced it is pulling out of the U.S. consumer market, as revealed on autoblog.com.
However, the OEM did state it is not– I repeat, not– leaving the commercial end of the market.
“Isuzu Motors Limited has decided to end its North American SUV (Sport Utility Vehicle) new vehicle sales business as of January 31. 2009,” according to the press release posted on autoblog.com. “With this decision to end SUV operations, Isuzu’s North American business will focus on the CV [commercial vehicle] and PT [diesel engines and components] businesses.”
Of course, Isuzu has built an enviable reputation as a truck supplier here in the states and benefited from a long-term relationship with General Motors that was reconfigured last year.
As a result, Isuzu Commercial Truck of America Inc. (ICTA) is now distributing its low-cab-forward vehicles directly to both the Isuzu dealer network and GM’s network of Chevrolet and GMC medium-duty dealers.
Clearly, trucks are where the bucks are. But anyone who remembers any of the rather nifty cars Isuzu peddled here back in the day– the Giorgetto Giugiaro-designed Impulse leaps to mind– not to mention the no-nonsense Trooper SUV– may again enjoy hearing a message from their very twisted U.S. pitchman, good old Joe Isuzu:
Though much slimmer than he once was, Bibendum– a.ka. The Michelin Man– is big enough to conceal secrets when he chooses.
Then again good old Bib (he is 110 years old!) is such a creature of public relations it should shock no one that he has graciously stepped aside long enough to let FleetOwner give you a sneak peak at the new tire his bosses at Michelin will fully reveal next week at the Technology & Maintenance Council (TMC) meeting in Orlando.
The new tire is the XZE2, the next generation of the XZE, which Michelin calls its best-selling truck tire.
Michelin tells us the new XE2 is a case of “the best just got better.”
According to Michelin, the XZE2 tire outperforms its XZE predecessor in a number of ways:
1) Significantly longer wear for additional miles with no performance compromise
2) Casing and siping designs that decrease irregular wear
3) Wider tread footprint for more stability
4) Tread rubber compound that was previously only available in LRH tires
5) Decrease in rolling resistance for better fuel economy.
The XZE2 will be offered starting March 1st in sizes 11R22.5, 275/80R22.5 and 11R24.5.
A 275/80R24.5 size will become available in April.
You can see the XZE2 in Orlando at Michelin’s booth (#1026) during TMC, which runs from Feb. 4-6, or just keep checking the FleetOwner website– updated daily!– to read a report on the tire as well as all the product and industry news reported from the show by FleetOwner editors on site.
Writing in The New York Times this week, columnist David Leonhardt defined what is happening to the U.S. economy as “the new moderation.”
And while I think he is 100% correct (read what he said here), what is happening now I think can much more directly be described as “Welcome back to the 1970s!”
Who out there remembers the “Me Decade”? Actually, in my mind the go-go ’80s were much more of a “me-first” period but I digress. How I recall the ’70s– beyond the generally horrible taste exhibited in almost everything from clothing to furniture save for cars and popular (not disco!) music and television– is that it was for better or worse a truly middle-class era.
Yes, 35 to 40 years ago there were plenty of persons living below the poverty line and as well as legions of the working poor– although I dare say there are more today. But there sure were fewer truly well-off people tooling around in luxomobile SUVs buying every new piece of electronica or kitchen countertop option for that matter that comes their way. And there were far fewer wannabes willing to embark on whatever risky financial gynmnastics they calculate could vault them into appearing or at least feeling “rich” or “upper class.”
Such cotton-candy whispy dreams had to end. But that doesn’t mean we are heading into a nightmare.
If everyone from Wall Street to Main Street does their part to intelligently downsize– especially the ridiculous and much too widely held belief that “consumers” can keep consuming at a dizzying pace forever and ever and ever– maybe just maybe everyone in this country who already has far more than their basic needs being met can slow down and consider there is more to life than square footage, wide screens and third-row seating.
If that happens, well, then maybe we can start to re-direct our formidable national energy from selling each other stuff and “’services” we don’t really need to being not only the world’s economic powerhouse but also the home of the kind of genius that propelled mankind ahead with such inventions as universal electricifcation, affordable automobiles, the telegraph and telephone, radio, motion pictures and television not to mention the personal computer, the Internet and the cell phone.
This nation was challenged to greatness by John F. Kennedy a few years after we’d been humiliated by the appearance of a dinky satellite dubbed Sputnik. JFK’s call to action was answered resoundingly. In much less than 10 years our nation went from a space-race has-been to putting, as Kennedy envisioned, a man on the moon.
“…in a very real sense, it will not be one man going to the moon–if we make this judgment affirmatively, it will be an entire nation. For all of us must work to put him there.”
–John F. Kennedy, May 25, 1961
If we could do that back then with the crude technology of the day why can’t we do more to excel and advance as a nation now?
I’ve no doubt that Fed rate cuts and tax refunds or stipends or whatever they’re calling them this time around will stimulate the economy to some degree. You put money on the street, it gets spent. Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that out.
But what will stimulate our economy to where we really want it to be–way out front of every other economic power on earth– will be if Americans can individually and collectively start working toward more than their comfort.
Nostalgia is a dangerous thing, tis true. It can cover up all sorts of unpleasant truths. But what I remember most fondly about the ’70s was the sense of shared experience that existed in this country.
No, I don’t want to give up any of the progress made on any front since those days. But I do yearn for that feeling of “we are all in this together and let’s try to do something about it” that seems to have largely fled the good old U.S.A. in the last 30-odd years.
Maybe the next POTUS will be the kind of leader who will stir our nation once again to action if not greatness.
But the reality is it is up to all of us to make this a time worth recalling one day as the good old days.
According to The Wall Street Journal this morning, the Fed chairman has “endorsed a ‘quickly’ implemented fiscal stimulus package, saying it would complement the Fed’s efforts to provide monetary-policy insurance against an economic downturn.” The Journal also reported that in prepared testimony, Bernanke “repeated the pledge he made last week to enact ’substantive’ rate cuts if needed to counter the threat to the economy posed by fragile financial markets and weakening employment. ”
Way to go, Ben! What’s more, according to CNNMoney.com, our Lame Duck in Chief has indicated that he will support an economic stimulus package– even though it will mean making nice with the Frustrated Majority up on Capitol Hill.
On the other hand, we keep hearing that the $14-trillion– or some such unfathomable figure– U.S. economy is akin to the battleship that, no matter what harm’s way it is steaming into, cannot be turned on a dime.
Even so, there is such a thing as psyching people up. Americans both indiviudally and collectively as businesspersons are more apt to do what they can to help our economy if they feel the government is in there with them, shoulder to shoulder, trying to keep things moving at least forward.
By the way, The New York Times is running an extensive profile on Mr. Bernanke. It may be worth a look-see, if like me, you ever wonder much about how the hell things actually happen in this great, grand country of ours.
Where the money is…
SPECIAL BONUS !
Courtesy of Reuters, here is the Head Fed in Talking Head mode:
